Talk: Theory and reflection in pedagogy planner tools to support learning design

Liz Masterman and Marion Manton talk at LAMS 09 conference, 7th July 09

Cloud created by:

Gráinne Conole
7 July 2009

The problem space – theories the why and the wherefore, review of previous work?

  • Work as part of the LDSE project
  • Eliciting practitioners’ perspectives on theory and reflection
  • Implication for design of the LDSE

The value of theory

  • Lawes, 2004: 199 Framework of understanding that improve the quality of practice and leads to the transformation of subjective experience
  • Conole 2008: Ensure that pedagogy drives the use of digital technology and not vice versa
  • Mayes and De Freitas: Ensure good pedagogical design

A meta-taxonomy – theory covers a multitude of things
4 useful categories

  • Theories as a way of understanding and predicting something – explanatory (Cook 2002)
  • Model an abstract representation that helps us understand something we cant see or experience directly (Conole, Oliver, et al.  2007)
  • Framework structure and vocabulary that support the explication of concepts and issues (Conole and Oliver 2002)
  • Taxonomy – an ordering classification (Merriam-Webster 1993)

JISC Planner tools

  • London Pedagogy Planner: Used Conversational Framework as the underpinning to take users through design decisions
  • Phoebe: Form filling to create designs, but had concept sensitive help

Perspectives on theory from these projects

  • Theory is a cornerstone of professional practice… and an antidote to technological determinism
  • Bt do teachers consciously espouse formal theories or are they driven by prior experience and reflective practice
  • Combine knowledge of theory with skills to make decisions
  • LDSE – funded under TLRP TEL programme
  • Theory informed but room for individual interpretation
  • Embed appropriate theories into tools and support what it? Modeling of learning designs
  • Uses knowledge engineering to build an ontology of learning designs – concepts and their relationships and educational theories
  • Practitioners use of theory – research questions
  • What is the value of educational theories in learning design?
  • What theories etc are they aware of and do they use?

Working with 10 informant practitioners – who can see the vision and potential
Value of theories

  • Part of a “world view” of learning design: “constructivism is a big part of what I do”
  • For structuring students’ learning: I always try and map everything I do onto CF
  • A yardstick for measuring change: I’m trying to effect change and they are useful markers
  • For critiquing and challenging: I regard theories as ways of critiquing something
  • Balance between theory and pragmatic considerations
  • I linked things up, I want them to get this out of a session, informed decisions – time, number of students, etc, how to motivate them
  • Were asked about a range of learning theories:Inquiry learning, problem based learning, Kolb, Bruner’s spiral curriculum, Ausubel’s advanced organizer, communities of practice etc
  • Multiple interweaving influences – tend to use a mix of theories
  • Some evidence of sloppiness
  • Different between theories of teaching (pedagogic theories) vs theories of learning
  • Pedagogic theories – take the form of models, frameworks for constructing a learning experience
  • Theories of learning – explain how students learn, explanations of how people come to know
  • Approach through practice – priority is to give them the tools they need to teach right  now informed by their understanding of the theories that you are filtering

 

Extra content

Embedded Content

Contribute

Contribute to the discussion

Please log in to post a comment. Register here if you haven't signed up yet.