Regional Collaborations

Cloud created by:

MITE Team
13 February 2009

A discussion and exchange of experiences in emerging regional collaborations.

Extra content

Embedded Content

Contribute

Andrew Moore
7:29pm 4 March 2009


Lessons in Building "Regional" OER Communities

Presenters:  Liz Levey, John Dehlin


•    4-5 years trying to build communities
•    Regional can mean location, topical, etc.
•    How do you derive productivity from professionals with "day jobs"?
•    How to manage competing issues/motives across projects?
•    Collaborative vs. authoritative

o    Lots of talk vs. meaningful results
•    Funding?
o    Meaningful progress WITHOUT  funding
•    How to communicate in early stages?
o    Time zones?
o    Languages?
o    Cultures?
o    What medium to use for communication?
•    Technology?

 

 

•    Open coursework consortium
o    Publishing online courses is necessary for membership
o    Growing through regional consortiums
o    Less issues at the regional consortium level
•    Finding the right scope is essential
•    What are the right scopes in Africa?
•    Work together in a local network to make easier
•    Growth rate in US is slow
•    Scale is the largest issue

o    People tend to self identify
o    People want to only work in their own area
•    You have to find two people who want to work together, you can't just put people together
•    Took a long time to get all the big-name universities together
•    Korean consortium grew to rival Japanese consortium
•    Would consortiums work together?

o    Salad bowl not melting pot
•    MIT link consortium
o    Middle east consortiums decided work cross border
o    Math and science videos for high schools
o    Project has been demand driven
o    Difficulty would be freeing up the teachers to create the videos
o    Videos used and evaluated starting next year
o    Bring universities together with secondary schools
•    If we make content available that is solving the problem? How are we getting students to use it?
•    OLnet is to push research and share research
•    Everyone fell into the cycle

o    Mentoring was a key part to continue cycle
o    Power relation aspect holds up cycle
•    Good to have students in on content creation
•    OER movement is just leaving the sharing only stage
•    You have to start with a clearly defined need
•    TESSA has a partner advisory council to govern and strategize (this was necessary for it to work)
•    Open blinds so people can see what is happening not necessarily take from and use
•    Convert content to online to share and improve all content

o    Get content online so we can move on to working on teaching and learning
•    Is there anyone who knows how to evaluate how the content is used?
•    Emphasis on expanding networks and contacts
•    Not enough resources to create new networks so make use of current network

o    Must have to have a mutual interest in collaboration and it must be demand driven
•    Demand driven approach is the base not the second step
•    Teachers are not getting source content from OER repositories
•    Simple streamline mechanisms to communicate between all projects at the same time
•    OLnet is trying to be a channel for communication
•    Teachers need information literacy skills (they need to be taught the most productive places and processes to search for content)
•    Central point for open learning content
•    You need to know what you are looking for and how to find it
•    Should be solvable without extensive training
•    "Dating service for projects"

 



"Ditched regional and just talked about collaboration."

Stian Haklev
4:09pm 5 March 2009 (Edited 12:04pm 2 December 2009)


The Openlearn report mentioned during the meeting can be downloaded from this page:

http://kn.open.ac.uk/public/document.cfm?docid=11803

Contribute to the discussion

Please log in to post a comment. Register here if you haven't signed up yet.