Cloudworks is no longer accepting new user registrations, and will be closing down on 24th June 2019. We hope to make a read-only archive of the site available soon after.

Critical reviewing

Research Skills required by PhD students A5: Critical reviewing.

Cloud created by:

3 March 2010

A5: The ability to critically analyse and evaluate one's findings and those of others

Check this skill

By the time students complete a PhD, they should be able to answer ‘Yes’ to most of these questions.

  • Given a report of some research, can you think of other ways in which the research question might have been addressed?
  • Given a set of evidence, can you think of alternative ways of interpreting it? Given a set of research papers, can you summarise their work in a table, comparing their methods, findings, and distinctions? Given two accounts of research results, can you give reasoned argument as to which account is more likely to apply?
  • Can you specify what further work would be needed to choose between the accounts?
  • If you identify a limitation in someone else's research, can you explain how that limitation might be addressed in future studies?
  • Can you identify assumptions in your own studies and reasoning?
  • Can you discuss objectively weaknesses in your own findings?
  • Can you identify when further work is needed to substantiate your findings?
  • Do you contribute to seminar discussions with constructive criticism and with informed questions?

Evidence of this skill

These are examples of documents you can collect. Each implies a piece or work, which may be a good way for you to develop this skill.

  • The literature review component of your probation assessment.
  • A table critically comparing a set of studies in your area.
  • A published review of research in some aspect of your field.
  • A record of presenting and critically discussing a paper in a reading group, journal club, or equivalent.
  • A record of presenting your own findings and your interpretation/analysis of them, and of defending them in response to questions.
  • A record of raising pertinent questions at research seminars.
  • A written 'gap analysis' of a research paper or group of papers.
  • Examples of data analysis carried out and critically interpreted.

This page is based upon material produced by The Open University’s research school to support doctoral students.

Extra content

Embedded Content


Contribute to the discussion

Please log in to post a comment. Register here if you haven't signed up yet.