Elisabetta Lando: How to use the learning design parameters in an F.E context
Create a course for practitioners in the post 16 sector.
A working model that is relevant to curriculum areas in the F.E sector- innovative yet at the same time deals with the changing landscape and demands within the sector such as changes to funding, intake of 14 -19 year old learners and so on.
Extra content
Comment 1 by Diana Laurilllard
Comment 2 by elisabetta Lando

elisabetta Lando
4:19pm 13 January 2013 (Edited 4:29pm 13 January 2013)
Permalink
Absolutely! Those are the main ideas though I do not quite envisage quite what yet! I am hoping a team will come together to firm this idea up
Comment 3 by elisabetta Lando

elisabetta Lando
9:21am 16 January 2013 (Edited 10:44am 16 January 2013)
Permalink
On further reflection- it could be a course for F.E practitioners( and management) looking at aspects of a 'new curriculum delivery approach'.With reduction in funding there is a real risk that learners do handouts ( either paper or digital) with no teacher present under the heading of timetabled virtual learning .
How can we plan for creative, interactive and independent learning yet with real personalised support. What about the learners and the teachers? The challenges, what the negatives aspects/obstacles are.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1mo04JR6Jdz0y1Ag8gTfZcWXUOW3ArK2QLToiD8JX9b0/edit
Comment 4 by Dan McCaffrey

Dan McCaffrey
10:11am 17 January 2013 Permalink
Hi Elisbetta-
Just (belatedly) submitted my own proposal, which is in accord with this one as I understand it. My (limited) experience is that owing to constraints on time, predominantly, practitioners in the FE and Skills sector do not engage with the idea of Learning Design, in online or physical environments as easily as they should do. Consequently I believe there is an argument to be made that engaging with these considerations can improve the quality of learning within these milieu, and my proposal broadly outlines how (with an emphsis also on demonstrating the qualitative and qualitative benefits of engagement; like it or not we work in an increasingly commodified sector and I don't think just saying "you should do this" is sufficient; we need an evidence base in order to make engagement appealing. It also strikes me that presently the conversation is rather HE-centric so a glossary and/or contextualisation of terms appproriate for practitioners in these environments needs to be included.
Comment 5 by Dan McCaffrey

Dan McCaffrey
10:14am 17 January 2013 Permalink
Also-happy to team up on this proposal, with the broad aim of creating online learning design templates applicable to practicioners in the FE and Skills sectors; This seems to be broadly where we're both headed.
Comment 6 by Dan McCaffrey

Dan McCaffrey
10:14am 17 January 2013 Permalink
Also-happy to team up on this proposal, with the broad aim of creating online learning design templates applicable to practicioners in the FE and Skills sectors; This seems to be broadly where we're both headed.
Comment 7 by Stephen Bright
Stephen Bright
2:56am 23 January 2013 Permalink
Elisabetta - Dan just to let you know the address of a study circle I've created... don't mind shifting to someone else's Study Circle if that makes the interaction more convenient.
http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/2803
Regards
Stephen
Contribute to the discussion
Please log in to post a comment. Register here if you haven't signed up yet.
Diana Laurilllard
4:16pm 12 January 2013 Permalink
Elisabetta do you mean that the teaching practitioners are to be participants in the course? Would you be producting a working model for FE teachers to use and adapt to their own curricula? And that it would be a working model of an innovative and responsive curriculum?