The web-site is now in readonly mode. Login and registration are disabled. (28 June 2019)

Rosie Earl's review of learning design models

Cloud created by:

Rosie Earl
30 March 2013

The first model that appealed to me was the 4Ts Model, because I found it the clearest of the group and easy to get a grasp on. It works in a similar way to how I plan my session notes at work - splitting everything into categories so noting is missed. I also liked the skeleton structure style that the model had. I am often criticised for not going into enough detail in my notes, so using something like this would be ideal for me in the preparation phase. I could get my skeleton organised, then flesh it out with the detail required for the notes. Although the model itself doesn't allow for a lot of detail, it is a good foundation to work from.

The second model that appealed to me was the Design Principles Database model. Although I didn't fully get my head around it straight away, I really liked the concept of a design tool that allowed you to explore accessible features in a hands on way. I like to use lots on different media in my training and I felt this model helps the designer not only explore what is available, but give reasons why it is relevant and valuable.

I feel both of these methods would have been valuable to me when designing the e learning module I described in my previous cloud. The 4Ts model would have given me a solid base to explain to the Senior Managers, who were in experienced in e learning, what I was aiming for in the planning stage. The Design Principles Dadabase would have helped me to better articulate why I had chosen an e learning format, and would have helped me to be more creative with the limited technology to hand.

Extra content

Embedded Content

Contribute

Contribute to the discussion

Please log in to post a comment. Register here if you haven't signed up yet.